<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Girard-Perregaux&#8217;s new 1966 range of models break cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewatchpress.com/girard-perregauxs-new-1966-range-of-models-break-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewatchpress.com/girard-perregauxs-new-1966-range-of-models-break-cover/</link>
	<description>Luxury Watch reviews and news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glashutte Original Senator Sixties Panorama Date &#124; TheWatchPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thewatchpress.com/girard-perregauxs-new-1966-range-of-models-break-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Glashutte Original Senator Sixties Panorama Date &#124; TheWatchPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewatchpress.com/?p=654#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] are somehow stepping back in time to the swinging sixties, given that my last feature dealt with the Girard-Perregaux 1966 watches. However that&#8217;s certainly not the case. What we are seeing from these watchmakers is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are somehow stepping back in time to the swinging sixties, given that my last feature dealt with the Girard-Perregaux 1966 watches. However that&#8217;s certainly not the case. What we are seeing from these watchmakers is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
